Tripadvisor has changed its animal-welfare policy to stop enabling ticket sales for most horse, dog and camel racing and for rodeo-style events, drawing both praise from animal advocates and criticism from parts of the rodeo industry.
The change is significant because Tripadvisor and its booking businesses help travelers discover and purchase experiences around the world. The policy does not outlaw racing or rodeos, and it does not necessarily remove every related review or attraction page. Instead, it restricts what can be sold through the company’s booking platform and what can generate booking revenue for Tripadvisor.
What the policy actually says
In its current Animal Welfare Policy, Tripadvisor says it will not allow ticket sales for certain experiences in which domesticated animals face a heightened risk of injury or death for sport or entertainment.
The company specifically says it does not enable bookings for animal racing—described as most dog, horse and camel racing—or for rodeo-style events whose formats typically create those risks.

That distinction matters. Describing the change simply as a “ban on rodeos and racing” can imply that Tripadvisor has legal authority over the events themselves. It does not. This is a commercial booking policy: the events may still occur, but Tripadvisor will not sell tickets to the covered experiences through its platform.
The policy also leaves room for other experiences involving domesticated animals. Working or riding animals, exhibitions, petting farms, community fairs, festivals and cultural events may remain bookable when they follow responsible welfare practices guided by the Five Domains of Animal Welfare, unless another part of the policy specifically prohibits them.
Animal-welfare groups welcome the move
The Vancouver Humane Society welcomed the change, arguing that ticketing platforms influence which animal attractions tourists support. The group said ending sales for racing and rodeo experiences could help reduce the normalization of entertainment that places animals at risk.
Supporters point to concerns that can arise in competitive events, including physical strain, stress, exhaustion and injury. They also argue that large travel companies have a responsibility to consider animal welfare when deciding which experiences to monetize and promote.
The debate is not over
Rodeo supporters and some event operators have pushed back. They say rodeo is tied to cultural traditions and rural history, and they argue that rules, veterinary oversight and responsible handling can protect participating animals. Some businesses have also raised concerns about losing access to a major tourism sales channel.

Tripadvisor’s decision does not settle the wider argument over racing and rodeo. It does, however, show how animal-welfare expectations are increasingly shaping the travel marketplace. Tourists are no longer only asking whether an attraction is available or traditional; many are also asking what participation means for the animals involved.
For travelers, the clearest takeaway is that booking choices carry influence. Platforms decide what they are willing to sell, while customers decide which experiences they are willing to support.
Sources
- Tripadvisor Animal Welfare Policy
- Vancouver Humane Society statement
- Coverage of rodeo-industry response
